In this chapter, I shall first examine two formalistic attempts to derive ought from is and show why they are not successful. Then I shall discuss the substantive attempt to derive ought from is made by contemporary Aristotelian virtue ethicists, particularly Rosalind Hursthouse. I argue that such an attempt proceeds in the right direction. Its problem largely lies more in the is part than the ought part: since the descriptive is statement is problematic, the normative ought statement derived from it becomes also problematic. So in the last section of this chapter, I examine Zhu Xi’s neo-Confucian attempt to derive ought from is, which in general structure is similar to the neo-Aristotelian one but starts with a different is statement. I argue that this neo-Confucian one is more promising.
CITATION STYLE
Huang, Y. (2020). Zhu Xi and the Fact/Value Debate: How to Derive Ought from Is. In Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Vol. 13, pp. 809–829). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29175-4_34
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.