Initial energy for external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To investigate the initial energy level required for electrical cardioversion of atrialfibrillation (AF). Methods - We studied patients undergoing electrical cardioversion in the 1st Multicenter Trial of SOCESP. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the initial energy level of electrical cardioversion: 100J and ≥150J. We compared the efficacy of the initial and final shock of the procedure, the number of shocks administered, and the cumulative energy levels. Results - Eight-six patients undenvent electrical cardioversion. In 53 patients (62%), cardioversion was started with 100J, and in 33 patients (38%), cardioversion was started with ≥50J. Groups did not differ regarding clinical features and therapeutical interventions. A tendency existed towards greater efficacy of the initial shock in patients who received ≥150J (61% vs. 42% in the 100J group, p=0.08). The number of shocks was smaller in the ≥150J group (1.5±0.7vs.2.1±1.3, p=0.04). No difference existed regarding the final efficacy of electrical cardioversion and total cumulative energy levels in both groups. In the subgroup of patients with recent-onset AF (≤48h), the cumulative energy level was lower in the 100J group (240±227J vs. 324±225J, p=0.03). Conclusion - Patients who were given initial energy of ≥150J received fewer counter shocks with a tendency toward greater success than those patients who were given 7007; however, in patients with recent-onset AF, the average cumulative energy level was lower in the 100J group. These data suggest that electrical cardioversion should be initiated with energy levels ≤150J in patients with chronic AF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Figueiredo, E., Veloso, H. H., & De Paola, A. A. V. (2002). Initial energy for external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 79(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2002001100004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free