Consensus of cyber-physical power systems based on multi-agent systems with communication constraints

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The consensus protocol of cyber-physical power systems is proposed based on fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication constraints. It aims to enable each generator to reach a time-varying common rotor angle and rotor speed. Communication constraints including event-triggered sampling and partial information transmission are considered to render the consensus protocol more realistic. The Zeno behavior is excluded during the system sampling process. A sufficient condition is derived to solve the consensus problem. The effectiveness of the proposed consensus protocol is demonstrated by a numerical example.

References Powered by Scopus

Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems

2214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Some necessary and sufficient conditions for second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems

1319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics

1310Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Consensus Algorithm Based Power Distribution Technology for Energy Storage System in DC Microgrid

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cyber-physical Power System Modeling for Timing-driven Control of Active Distribution Network

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discrete Higher Order Sliding Mode Protocol for Leader-Following Consensus of Heterogeneous Discrete Multi-Agent System

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, C., Feng, C., & Cao, J. (2019). Consensus of cyber-physical power systems based on multi-agent systems with communication constraints. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 7(5), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-018-0491-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

67%

Computer Science 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free