Economic evaluation of participatory learning and action with women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists to improve birth outcomes in rural eastern India

13Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains unacceptably high in many low and middle-income countries, including India. A community mobilisation intervention using participatory learning and action with women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) was conducted to improve maternal and newborn health. The intervention was evaluated through a cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted in Jharkhand and Odisha, eastern India. This aims to assess the cost-effectiveness this intervention. Methods: Costs were estimated from the provider's perspective and calculated separately for the women's group intervention and for activities to strengthen Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHNSC) conducted in all trial areas. Costs were estimated at 2017 prices and converted to US dollar (USD). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated with respect to a do-nothing alternative and compared with the WHO thresholds for cost-effective interventions. ICERs were calculated for cases of neonatal mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Results: The incremental cost of the intervention was USD 83 per averted DALY (USD 99 inclusive of VHSNC strengthening costs), and the incremental cost per newborn death averted was USD 2545 (USD 3046 inclusive of VHSNC strengthening costs). The intervention was highly cost-effective according to WHO threshold, as the cost per life year saved or DALY averted was less than India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. The robustness of the findings to assumptions was tested using a series of one-way sensitivity analyses. The sensitivity analysis does not change the conclusion that the intervention is highly cost-effective. Conclusion: Participatory learning and action with women's groups facilitated by ASHAs was highly cost-effective to reduce neonatal mortality in rural settings with low literacy levels and high neonatal mortality rates. This approach could effectively complement facility-based care in India and can be scaled up in comparable high mortality settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Every Newborn: Progress, priorities, and potential beyond Survival

1316Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: Cluster-randomised controlled trial

651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report

567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Community-based maternal and newborn educational care packages for improving neonatal health and survival in low- and middle-income countries

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community interventions with women's groups to improve women's and children's health in India: A mixed-methods systematic review of effects, enablers and barriers

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of participatory women's groups scaled up by the public health system to improve birth outcomes in Jharkhand, eastern India: A pragmatic cluster non-randomised controlled trial

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinha, R. K., Haghparast-Bidgoli, H., Tripathy, P. K., Nair, N., Gope, R., Rath, S., & Prost, A. (2017). Economic evaluation of participatory learning and action with women’s groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists to improve birth outcomes in rural eastern India. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-017-0064-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

58%

Researcher 14

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

35%

Social Sciences 13

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

22%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 78

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free