Chemometric processing of pharmaceutical essential oil fingerprints- comparison of GC, HPLC, TLC, IR spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fifteen essential oils of pharmaceutical grade were fingerprinted by five techniques: TLC, GC, HPLC, attenuated total reflectance FTIR spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Denoising and baseline removal was found to be a crucial step for correct comparative analysis. Standardization of the signal was not necessary in the presented case; however, it should be considered and checked in each case. Due to small variance explained by first two principal components (below 50%) and outlying observations, the main analysis was performed by Euclidean dendrograms. It was found that almost all techniques besides DSC find real chemical similarities; however, DSC can be used as an additional tool. The similarities among the five techniques were also compared and discussed. © 2012 Publishing Technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pietras, R., Skibinski, R., Trebacz, H., & Gumieniczek, A. (2012). Chemometric processing of pharmaceutical essential oil fingerprints- comparison of GC, HPLC, TLC, IR spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. Journal of AOAC International. AOAC International. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.SGE_Pietras

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free