Assessment of the cost and accuracy of the generalized FEM

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we address the cost versus accuracy capabilities for the generalized FEM (GFEM) which was developed in (Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2003; 192:3109-3161, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 2004; 60:1639-1672, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, August 2003 (Advisor: T. Strouboulis)), and also the construction of two-sided a posteriori error estimates, which can be used to assess the achieved accuracy at all levels of the method. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications

3099Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The partition of unity method

2191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method

1043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimal local approximation spaces for generalized finite element methods with application to multiscale problems

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient Finite Element Methodology based on Cartesian grids: Application to structural shape optimization

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flux Norm Approach to Finite Dimensional Homogenization Approximations with Non-Separated Scales and High Contrast

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strouboulis, T., Zhang, L., & Babuška, I. (2007). Assessment of the cost and accuracy of the generalized FEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 69(2), 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1750

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

47%

Researcher 4

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 13

72%

Physics and Astronomy 2

11%

Mathematics 2

11%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0