Control of heterobasidion in norway spruce stands: The impact of stump cover on efficacy of urea and phlebiopsis gigantea and implications for forest management

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of Rotstop®, a native Latvian Phlebiopsis gigantea strain and 35% urea solution in combination with a stump cover treatment to control against natural spore infection by Heterobasidion spp. upon precommercial thinning of Norway spruce in three stands growing on former agricultural lands. The major findings were that (i) infection rates of Heterobasidion spp. on stumps treated with the native P. gigantea strain, Rotstop® or urea are similar when stumps are uncovered, and (ii) stump cover promotes stump colonization by the Latvian P. gigantea strain and Rotstop®, leading to a significantly smaller relative area colonized by Heterobasidion spp., as well greater efficiency against Heterobasidion in comparison with urea. Covering of stumps appears beneficial for controlling Heterobasidion stump colonization and may be valuable to forest owners if used in small-scale operations, but it is impractical in automatized thinnings, where managers should consider using regular Rotstop® without covering the stumps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zaluma, A., Sherwood, P., Bruna, L., Skola, U., Gaitnieks, T., & Rönnberg, J. (2021). Control of heterobasidion in norway spruce stands: The impact of stump cover on efficacy of urea and phlebiopsis gigantea and implications for forest management. Forests, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free