The Communication Desideratum and Theories of Indexical Reference

12Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

According to the communication desideratum (CD), a notion of semantic content must be adequately related to communication. In the recent debate on indexical reference, (CD) has been invoked in arguments against the view that intentions determine the semantic content of indexicals and demonstratives (intentionalism). In this article, I argue that the interpretations of (CD) that these arguments rely on are questionable, and suggest an alternative interpretation, which is compatible with (strong) intentionalism. Moreover, I suggest an approach that combines elements of intentionalism with other subjectivist approaches, and discuss the role of intuitions in developing and evaluating theories of indexical reference.

References Powered by Scopus

Radical Interpretation

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

I am not here now

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speaker intentions in context

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Expressing the self: Cultural diversity and cognitive universals

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Against the speaker-intention theory of demonstratives

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utterance Interpretation and Actual Intentions

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Åkerman, J. (2015). The Communication Desideratum and Theories of Indexical Reference. Mind and Language, 30(4), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12087

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 4

57%

Computer Science 2

29%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free