Comparison of semi-continuous and interrupted suture techniques for mitral valve replacement

2Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of semi-continuous technique and interrupted suture technique for mitral valve replacement in early post-operative period. Method: The randomised prospective study was conducted at Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Pakistan, from December 2012 to December 2014 The patients were divided into two equal groups: Group I patients underwent semi-continuous technique for mitral valve replacement, and Group II underwent interrupted technique. Data was analysed using SPSS 16. Results: The 100 patients were divided into two equal groups of 50(50%) each. There was no significant difference in terms of age, gender and pre-operative echocardiographic characteristics (p>0.05 each). Total bypass and crossclamp times were significantly higher in Group II (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001). The incidence of peri-prosthetic leakage was low in Group II compared to Group I but it was not significantly different (p=0.64). Conclusions: Semi-continuous technique was found to be a safe and reliable method of mitral valve replacement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azam, H., Hussain, G., Ahmed, N., Baig, M. A. R., Zaheer, S., & Gilani, S. R. A. (2015). Comparison of semi-continuous and interrupted suture techniques for mitral valve replacement. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 65(8), 844–846. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-s2-o1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free