T cell activation in vivo results in proliferation and generation of effector cytokine-secreting cells, as also in development of memory cells that mount enhanced responses upon restimulation. However, differences in the signals promoting generation of effector vs memory T cells are not yet characterized. In this study, using various strategies to modulate an allorecognition system for priming human T cells in vitro, we show that there are indeed differences between the signaling requirements for a first proliferative response and those for priming T cells for enhanced recall proliferative responses. Using APCs fixed with varying concentrations of paraformaldehyde, we show that the loss of ability of these APCs to generate a first response is not matched by a similar loss in their ability to prime responder T cells for recall responses. Prevention of DNA replication during T cell priming with aphidicolin, a DNA polymerase inhibitor, is not inimical to successful T cell priming. Thus, clonal expansion during priming is less crucial than the primed activation status of T cells for the enhanced recall response. We also show that pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, inhibits the primary proliferative response, but its presence during priming enhances the recall response capabilities of T cells. On the other hand, the presence of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporin A during priming reduces the efficiency of priming, but at low concentrations it induces, like pentoxifylline, enhancement in recall response capability. These findings have significant implications in designing immunosuppressive therapy and in the analysis of signals for T cell memory commitment.
CITATION STYLE
Gupta, M., Satyaraj, E., Durdik, J. M., Rath, S., & Bal, V. (1997). Differential regulation of T cell activation for primary versus secondary proliferative responses. The Journal of Immunology, 158(9), 4113–4121. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.158.9.4113
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.