Reflection/Commentary on a Past Article: “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research”

  • Corbin Dwyer S
  • Buckle J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Should qualitative researchers be members of the population they are studying, or should they not? Although this issue has been explored within the context of qualitative research, it has generally been reserved for discussions of observation, field research, and ethnography. The authors expand that discussion and explore membership roles by illustrating the insider status of one author and the outsider status of the other when conducting research with specific parent groups. The strengths and challenges of conducting qualitative research from each membership status are examined. Rather than consider this issue from a dichotomous perspective, the authors explore the notion of the space between that allows researchers to occupy the position of both insider and outsider rather than insider or outsider.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corbin Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. L. (2018). Reflection/Commentary on a Past Article: “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 160940691878817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918788176

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free