After viewing a picture of an environment, our memory of it typically extends beyond what was presented, a phenomenon referred to as boundary extension. But, sometimes memory errors show the opposite pattern—boundary contraction—and the relationship between these phenomena is controversial. We constructed virtual three-dimensional environments and created a series of views at different distances, from object close-ups to wide-angle indoor views, and tested for memory errors along this object-to-scene continuum. Boundary extension was evident for close-scale views and transitioned parametrically to boundary contraction for far-scale views. However, this transition point was not tied to a specific position in the environment (e.g., the point of reachability). Instead, it tracked with judgments of the best-looking view of the environment, in both rich-object and low-object environments. We offer a dynamic-tension account, where competition between object-based and scene-based affordances determines whether a view will extend or contract in memory. This study demonstrates that boundary extension and boundary contraction are not two separate phenomena but rather two parts of a continuum, suggesting a common underlying mechanism. The transition point between the two is not fixed but depends on the observer’s judgment of the best-looking view of the environment. These findings provide new insights into how we perceive and remember a view of environment.
CITATION STYLE
Park, J., Josephs, E., & Konkle, T. (2024). Systematic transition from boundary extension to contraction along an object-to-scene continuum. Journal of Vision, 24(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/JOV.24.1.9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.