Evaluation of a Functional Restoration Program at Fort Bliss Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic

9Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: In partnership with the Veterans Health Administration, in 2010, the Department of Defense/Veterans Health Administration Pain Management Task Force Final Report recommended a comprehensive pain management plan. Consequently, each Army medical center established an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic (IPMC) for pain treatment, and each IPMC implements a multidisciplinary outpatient functional restoration program (FRP) as an alternative to or in addition to pharmacological therapy. This article reports our first-year FRP results at William Beaumont Army Medical Center IPMC. Materials and Methods: The FRP is designed to improve the participants' functionality and quality of life, both personally and professionally. Service members with chronic pain were evaluated for psychological and physical clearance before enrollment in an intense and structured FRP for 8 hours a day over 3 weeks. The program focused on physical and occupational exercises, yoga, acupuncture, and educational classes regarding pain medications, nutrition, and coping skills. The resulting data were analyzed using paired two-tailed t-tests with a predetermined significance level of 0.05 to examine the participants' mean changes upon completion of the FRP. Results: The pre-post comparison indicated significant improvement after completion of the FRP. The fear-avoidance of physical activities and the fear of movement scores were reduced significantly (P < 0.05); the Canadian occupational performance and satisfaction, physical strength and endurance were improved significantly (P < 0.0001) in sit-to-stand, plank balance, lifting and carrying, and 10-minute 7-to-1 Pyramid tests; however, fear-avoidance of work was not significantly reduced (P = 0.2319). Conclusions: Because of the lack of randomization and the small number of subjects (N = 32, 7 cohorts), unknown sources of bias may have influenced the results. Despite these limitations, the results from this report support the program's effectiveness and are consistent with the outcomes from FRP programs in other military facilities and in civilian studies.

References Powered by Scopus

A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability

2529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception-I

972Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength

699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Immersive Virtual Reality: A Safe, Scalable, Non-opioid Analgesic for Military and Veteran Patients

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Active Duty Service Members Newly Presenting With Low Back Pain in Fiscal Year 2017: Health Care Utilization, Access to Care, and Private Sector Costs Over 2-year Follow-up

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pain neuroscience education improves post-traumatic stress disorder, disability, and pain self-efficacy in veterans and service members with chronic low back pain: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, K. T., Beauchamp, D. W., Lovett, U., Tillman, D., Janze, A., Ruiz, A., … Edlin, C. (2020). Evaluation of a Functional Restoration Program at Fort Bliss Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic. Military Medicine, 185(11–12), E2097–E2103. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaa200

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 8

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

17%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free