MERCY DEATH OR KILLING

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the most acute issues in current medical ethics is the problem of euthanasia. This term originally comes from the Greek word that originally meant “a good death” (eu—well, Thanatos—death). Needless to say that in every discussion about life and death we hold the a priori assumption that “life is good and that existing life should be preserved as a matter of course, unless some overriding principle supersedes the innate value of an ongoing life.”1 This assumption is one of the reasons for the immense difficulties of the discussion about “good death.” The issue of euthanasia became extremely complicated during the 20th century due to rapid technological progress that enabled maintaining the lives of terminal patients, even unconscious terminal patients, for extended periods of time. However, while we may possess powerful life-prolonging medical technology, on the ethical level “we are unable to find meaning in death or to bring our lives to a meaningful close.”2 Thus, death as a whole, and euthanasia in particular, have become complex and painful issues in modern society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ezra, O. (2006). MERCY DEATH OR KILLING. In Law and Philosophy Library (Vol. 74, pp. 55–67). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4105-5_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free