Recalibrating scale, rupturing coloniality: On relational ethnography and its postcolonial reckonings

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Taking as its point of departure extant concerns about the Eurocentric nature of sociological knowledge production, and its inadequacy in dealing with questions of race, power, and coloniality, this article examines the hitherto unexplored significance of relational ethnography for postcolonial inquiry. It traces the critical coordinates of a relational turn in ethnography, endorsing how a recalibration of scale, and a commitment to crafting sociological analyses around multiple points of vantage, can support a decentring of Western ontologies which have long defined the narratives threads of history and social theory. The reflexive exposition that follows invokes my fieldwork experiences in Ghana, West Africa, to illustrate how a relational praxis (re)animated by postcolonial theory can at once rupture those hegemonic arrangements of knowledge-power that have long undergirded imperial frames of modernity, and reconstitute future narratives that speak to the relational entanglements which bind the tied fates of the postcolonial North and South.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGee, D. (2020). Recalibrating scale, rupturing coloniality: On relational ethnography and its postcolonial reckonings. Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120923378

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free