Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients: The performance of seven different functional hemodynamic parameters

Abstract

Background: Functional hemodynamic parameters such as stroke volume and pulse pressure variation (SVV and PPV) have been shown to be reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Today, different minimally- and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems measure functional hemodynamic parameters. Although some of these parameters are described by the same name, they differ in their measurement technique and thus may provide different results. We aimed to test the performance of seven functional hemodynamic parameters simultaneously in the same clinical setting. Methods: Hemodynamic measurements were done in 30 cardiac surgery patients that were mechanically ventilated. Before and after a standardized intravenous fluid bolus, hemodynamics were measured by the following monitoring systems: PiCCOplus (SVV PiCCO , PPV PiCCO ), LiDCO rapid (SVV LiDCO , PPV LiDCO ), FloTrac (SVV FloTrac ), Philips Intellivue (PPV Philips ) and Masimo pulse oximeter (pleth variability index, PVI). Prediction of fluid responsiveness was tested by calculation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves including a gray zone approach and compared using Fisher's Z-Test. Results: Fluid administration resulted in an increase in cardiac output, while all functional hemodynamic parameters decreased. A wide range of areas under the ROC-curve (AUC's) was observed: AUC-SVV PiCCO = 0.91, AUC-PPV PiCCO = 0.88, AUC-SVV LiDCO = 0.78, AUC-PPV LiDCO = 0.89, AUC-SVV FloTrac = 0.87, AUC-PPV Philips = 0.92 and AUC-PVI = 0.68. Optimal threshold values for prediction of fluid responsiveness ranged between 9.5 and 17.5%. Lowest threshold values were observed for SVV LiDCO , highest for PVI. Conclusion: All functional hemodynamic parameters tested except for PVI showed that their use allows a reliable identification of potential fluid responders. PVI however, may not be suitable after cardiac surgery to predict fluid responsiveness.