Physical Androgyny and Categorization Difficulty Shape Political Conservatives’ Attitudes Toward Transgender People

42Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Researchers have recently begun to examine how categorization processes impact social evaluations. In two studies, we examined how sex categorization influences attitudes toward transgender individuals. We found that people evaluated transgender individuals more negatively if they possessed physically androgynous (vs. sex-typical) characteristics because they struggled to identify their sex. These relationships were stronger among political conservatives compared to individuals with more liberal political views. These findings provide new insights for research on attitudes toward gender minorities and for the role of political ideology in social judgments.

References Powered by Scopus

Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders

4557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition

3495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations

3064Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Effects of Gender Trouble: An Integrative Theoretical Framework of the Perpetuation and Disruption of the Gender/Sex Binary

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Primacy of Gender: Gendered Cognition Underlies the Big Two Dimensions of Social Cognition

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Motivated Cognitive Basis of Transphobia: The Roles of Right-Wing Ideologies and Gender Role Beliefs

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stern, C., & Rule, N. O. (2018). Physical Androgyny and Categorization Difficulty Shape Political Conservatives’ Attitudes Toward Transgender People. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703172

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

81%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Researcher 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 31

84%

Social Sciences 3

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

5%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0