Medical thoracoscopy for the management of exudative pleural effusion: A retrospective study

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of exudative pleural effusion. Methods: A total of 82 patients with exudative pleural effusion underwent medical thor-acoscopy under local anesthesia and mild sedation. The clinical characteristics, pleural fluid routine and biochemical tests, pleural biopsy, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Among 82 patients, the color and transparency of pleural fluid and the levels of white blood cells (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil proportion, lymphocyte propor-tion, adenosine deaminase (ADA), and glucose were different among tuberculosis (TB), malignant (M), acute and chronic inflammation (ACI), and purulent (P) cases. Furthermore, 70% of M cases had a low positive rate of exfoliated cells in the sputum and pleural fluid, and more than 90% of TB cases had low positive rates of anti-tuberculosis antibodies and acid-fast bacilli in the sputum and pleural fluid. Pleural biopsy showed that 11% of cases were M, 74.4% were TB, 11% were ACI, and 3.6% were P. Medical thoracoscopy showed that 66.7% of ACI cases had pleural adhesions, 34.4% of TB cases had moderate and 34.4% of TB cases had severe pleural adhesions, 100% of M and TB cases had pleural surface nodules and 77.8% of ACI cases had pleural surface nodules, 49.2% of TB cases showed encapsulated pleural effusion, and 33.3% of M cases showed encapsulated pleural effusion. Conclusion: Medical thoracoscopy has high feasibility and accuracy in the diagnosis and treatment of exudative pleural effusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gong, L., Huang, G., Huang, Y., Liu, D., & Tang, X. (2020). Medical thoracoscopy for the management of exudative pleural effusion: A retrospective study. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2845–2855. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S287758

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free