I653 and isoflurane produce similar dose-related changes in the electroencephalogram of pigs

105Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I653 is a new volatile anesthetic structurally similar to enflurane and isoflurane. Since enflurane can induce convulsions, whereas isoflurane progressively depresses cortical electrical activity, the authors believed it important to assess the effect of I653 on the EEG (in both the 'time' and 'frequency' domain). The EEG was assessed visually and quantitatively, and a new EEG parameter was introduced. The burst-suppression ratio (percentage of time the EEG was isoelectric) quantified the extent of burst suppression phenomena. Eight swine were anesthetized with I653 or isoflurane in oxygen and in random sequence, exposed to approximately 0.8, 1.2, or 1.6 MAC with normocapnia and to 1.2 MAC with hypocapnia (P(ET)CO2 of 25 mmHg). Four animals were also anesthetized with 3.2% (1.2 MAC) enflurane in oxygen. Both I653 and isoflurane produced a dose-related depression of cortical electrical activity. At 0.8 and 1.2 MAC of either agent, occasional sharp waves occurred singly, were apparently not related to external (auditory) stimuli, and probably represented normal variation in the EEG. No electrographic or gross motor seizures occurred with either I653 or isoflurane. In contrast, all pigs given enflurane developed seizures during hypocapnia. At equipotent concentrations, I653 and isoflurane had the same effect on EEG parameters. Increasing doses of either I653 or isoflurane caused decreasing amplitude and frequency and increasing suppression. Hypocapnia during either agent slightly increased high-frequency activity, and slightly decreased burst suppression.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rampil, I. J., Weiskopf, R. B., Brown, J. G., Eger, E. I., Johnson, B. H., Holmes, M. A., & Donegan, J. H. (1988). I653 and isoflurane produce similar dose-related changes in the electroencephalogram of pigs. Anesthesiology, 69(3), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198809000-00002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free