Predicting outcome 12 months after mild traumatic brain injury in patients admitted to a neurosurgery service

31Citations
Citations of this article
172Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Accurate outcome prediction models for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) are key for prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making. Using multivariate machine learning, we tested the unique and added predictive value of (1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain morphometric and volumetric characterization at 4-week postinjury and (2) demographic, preinjury, injury-related, and postinjury variables on 12-month outcomes, including global functioning level, postconcussion symptoms, and mental health in patients with MTBI. Methods: A prospective, cohort study of patients (n = 147) aged 16-65 years with a 12-month follow-up. T1-weighted 3 T MRI data were processed in FreeSurfer, yielding accurate cortical reconstructions for surface-based analyses of cortical thickness, area, and volume, and brain segmentation for subcortical and global brain volumes. The 12-month outcome was defined as a composite score using a principal component analysis including the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, Rivermead Postconcussion Questionnaire, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Using leave-one-out cross-validation and permutation testing, we tested and compared three prediction models: (1) MRI model, (2) clinical model, and (3) MRI and clinical combined. Results: We found a strong correlation between observed and predicted outcomes for the clinical model (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). The MRI model performed at the chance level (r = 0.03, p = 0.80) and the combined model (r = 0.45, p < 0.002) were slightly weaker than the clinical model. Univariate correlation analyses revealed the strongest association with outcome for postinjury factors of posttraumatic stress (Posttraumatic Symptom Scale-10, r = 0.61), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, r = 0.52), and widespread pain (r = 0.43) assessed at 8 weeks. Conclusion: We found no added predictive value of MRI-based measures of brain cortical morphometry and subcortical volumes over and above demographic and clinical features.

References Powered by Scopus

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

36980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

32413Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS. A Practical Scale

10477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications

565Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Concussion as a multi-scale complex system: An interdisciplinary synthesis of current knowledge

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hellstrøm, T., Kaufmann, T., Andelic, N., Soberg, H. L., Sigurdardottir, S., Helseth, E., … Westlye, L. T. (2017). Predicting outcome 12 months after mild traumatic brain injury in patients admitted to a neurosurgery service. Frontiers in Neurology, 8(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00125

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 54

71%

Researcher 14

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 38

44%

Psychology 23

27%

Neuroscience 18

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free