Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response can be fast or slow: Implications for Lennartz and Weinberger’s (1992) two-factor theory

18Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane (NM) response usually requires several dozen trials for the first conditioned response (CR) to appear. However, as the number of trials is reduced to one per session, the rate of acquisition increases progressively, and the first CR appears in less than a dozen trials. This large and systematic variation in the rate of conditioning challenges recent conclusions by Lennartz and Weinberger (1992). They use the rabbit NM preparation as an example of a slow-conditioning, “specific” system that is distinct from a fast-conditioning, “nonspecific” system, such as heart rate. © 1994, Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kehoe, E. J., & Macrae, M. (1994). Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response can be fast or slow: Implications for Lennartz and Weinberger’s (1992) two-factor theory. Psychobiology, 22(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free