Temporal Resolution Ability in Students with Dyslexia and Reading and Writing Disorders

  • Chaubet J
  • Pereira L
  • Perez A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction The Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) test assesses the hearing ability of temporal resolution. The development of this ability can be considered essential for learning how to read. Objective Identify temporal resolution in individuals diagnosed with reading and writing disorders compared with subjects with dyslexia. Methods A sample of 26 subjects of both genders, age 10 to 15 years, included 11 diagnosed with dyslexia and 15 diagnosed with reading and writing disorders. Subjects did not display otologic, neurologic, and/or cognitive diseases. A control group of 30 normal-hearing subjects was formed to compare thresholds and percentages obtained from the GIN test. The responses were obtained considering two measures of analysis: the threshold gap and the percentage of correct gap. Results The threshold was lower in the GIN for the typical group than for the other groups. There was no difference between groups with dyslexia and with reading and writing disorders. The GIN results of the typical group revealed a higher percentage of correct answer than in the other groups. No difference was obtained between the groups with dyslexia and with reading and writing disorders. Conclusion The GIN test identified a difficulty in auditory ability of temporal resolution in individuals with reading and writing disorders and in individuals with dyslexia in a similar way.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaubet, J., Pereira, L., & Perez, A. (2014). Temporal Resolution Ability in Students with Dyslexia and Reading and Writing Disorders. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 18(02), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363465

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

36%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 6

40%

Social Sciences 4

27%

Psychology 4

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 51

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0