Scale development and an educational program to reduce the stigma of schizophrenia among community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial

5Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Stigma associated with mental disorders is rooted among many pharmacists, and represents a major barrier to patient support in community-based psychiatry. We developed an assessment scale that is specifically designed to assess the level of stigma that pharmacists may have toward schizophrenia, and then examined the effects of reducing stigma with an educational program that focuses on communication with patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (PDS) using the newly developed Stigma Scale towards Schizophrenia for Community Pharmacists (SSCP). Methods: SSCP was developed by exploratory factor analysis with promax rotation based on responses from 822 randomly selected community pharmacists. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial was conducted for 115 community pharmacists to clarify the effects of reducing the stigma of schizophrenia using an educational program for them with a focus on communication with PDS. Participants were individually allocated to two groups: educational lecture group (56; only attending a lecture on schizophrenia) or contact-based intervention group (59; communicating with PDS and attending the lecture). The stigma assessment using SSCP was conducted immediately before and after the educational intervention. Results: A total of 4 factors and 27 items were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis to comprise the SSCP. Cronbach’s α of SSCP, social distance at professional pharmacy service (factor I), attitudes towards PDS (factor II), self-disclosure (factor III), and social distance in personal (factor IV) were 0.89, 0.88, 0.76, 0.62, and 0.62, respectively. Educational program-related changes of the median (interquartile range) total SSCP score from baseline were − 9.0 (− 16.0 – − 5.0) in the contact-based intervention group and − 3.0 (− 7.0–1.0) in the educational lecture group, reflecting a significant reduction of stigma levels in the contact-based intervention group. On examining the SSCP subscales, scores for factor I and factor II significantly improved. The educational program was more effective for pharmacists aged 20–39 years or with negligible experience of communicating with PDS at work and/or in private life. Conclusions: SSCP and the educational program for community pharmacists that focuses on communication with PDS were useful for assessing and reducing, respectively, the stigma attached by these pharmacists to schizophrenia. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000043189, registered on January 30, 2021), Retrospectively registered.

References Powered by Scopus

How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediatorsy

1878Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination

853Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One hundred years of schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the outcome literature

660Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Perspectives of psychiatric patients in rural areas of Jordan: Barriers to compliance and pharmacist role

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tendency to Stigmatize Epidemic Diseases Scale: Scale Development and Validity Study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interventions to improve pharmacists’ competency in chronic disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujii, T., Hanya, M., Murotani, K., & Kamei, H. (2021). Scale development and an educational program to reduce the stigma of schizophrenia among community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03208-z

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

23%

Researcher 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 17

49%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 8

23%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

17%

Psychology 4

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0