Tobacco exposure and sleep disturbance in 498 208 UK Biobank participants

31Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The prevalence of sleep disturbance is high and increasing. The study investigated whether active, former and passive smoking were associated with sleep disturbance. Methods This cross-sectional study used data from the UK Biobank: a cohort study of 502 655 participants, of whom 498 208 provided selfreported data on smoking and sleep characteristics. Multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between smoking and sleep disturbance. Results Long-sleep duration (>9 h) was more common among current smokers [odds ratio (OR): 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-1.85; probability value (P) = 0.001] than never smokers, especially heavy (>20/day) smokers (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.66-4.89; P < 0.001). Former heavy (>20/day) smokers were also more likely to report short (<6 h) sleep duration (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.25-1.60; P < 0.001), long-sleep duration (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.47-2.71; P < 0.001) and sleeplessness (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.38-1.57; P < 0.001) than never smokers. Among never smokers, those who lived with more than one smoker had higher odds of long-sleep duration than those not cohabitating with a smoker (OR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.26-5.82; P = 0.011). Conclusions Active and passive exposure to high levels of tobacco smoke are associated with sleep disturbance. Existing global tobacco control interventions need to be enforced.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boakye, D., Wyse, C. A., Morales-Celis, C. A., Biello, S. M., Bailey, M. E. S., Dare, S., … Mackay, D. F. (2018). Tobacco exposure and sleep disturbance in 498 208 UK Biobank participants. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 40(3), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx102

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Researcher 7

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

56%

Psychology 8

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0