A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial of a decaffeinated energy drink shows no significant acute effect on mental energy

4Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: "Energy drinks" are heavily marketed to the general public, across the age spectrum. The efficacy of decaffeinated energy drinks in enhancing subjective feelings of energy (s-energy) is controversial. Objective: The authors sought to test the efficacy of the caffeine-free version of a popular energy drink compared with a placebo drink. Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in 223 healthy men and women aged 18-70 y with intention-to-treat and completers analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to consumption of either the decaffeinated energy drink or a placebo drink on testing day 1, and the other drink a week later. A battery of computer-based mood and cognitive tests to assess s-energy was conducted at baseline and at 0.5, 2.5, and 5 h post-ingestion. The main outcome measures were 1) mood, which was assessed by using a General Status Check Scale and the Profile of Mood States 2nd edition brief form, and 2) cognitive measures, including the N-back task (reaction time and accuracy), Reaction Time test, Flanker task (distraction avoidance), and Rapid Visual Information Processing test. Results: No statistically significant or meaningful benefits were observed for any outcome measure, including mood and cognitive measures. Analyses of mean differences, slopes, and median differences were consistent. Conclusions: No differences were detected across a range of mood/cognitive/behavioral/s-energy-level tests after consumption of the energy drink compared with a placebo drink in this diverse sample of adults. Thus, we found strong evidence that the energy drink is not efficacious in enhancing s-energy levels, nor any related cognitive or behavioral variables measured. In light of federal regulations, these findings suggest that labeling and marketing of some products which claim to provide these benefits may be unsubstantiated. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02727920.

References Powered by Scopus

A power primer

34278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python

3391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis

2885Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

International society of sports nutrition position stand: energy drinks and energy shots

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subsume Pediatric Headaches in Psychiatric Disorders? Critiques on Delphic Nosology, Diagnostic Conundrums, and Variability in the Interventions

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute beneficial effects of a functional energy shot on cognitive performance and mood states during cognitively demanding task performance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia-Alvarez, A., Cunningham, C. A., Mui, B., Penn, L., Spaulding, E. M., Michael Oakes, J., … Cheskin, L. J. (2020). A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial of a decaffeinated energy drink shows no significant acute effect on mental energy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 111(3), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz343

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 30

54%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 35

66%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

15%

Sports and Recreations 5

9%

Psychology 5

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free