Organizational Communication and Conflict Management Systems

  • Aula P
  • Siira K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of the present article is to examine the prevailing model of systematic organizational conflict management from an organizational communicative perspective and to suggest directions for improvement. Particularly the model of conflict management system (CMS) is examined at the macro-level from the novel theoretical perspective of social complexity augmented with an interpretive view of organizational communication. Specifically two models – the dual function of communication and the arena model – are utilized to illustrate weaknesses and points of development in traditional CMS thinking. CMS was found to represent a rather limited vision of contemporary conflict management. It is rooted in a mechanistic view of organizational communication, which, we assert, is problematic from the organizational conflict management perspective, both theoretically and practically. The differences between CMS and social complexity approaches are identified, and a fresh framework for strategic conflict management is introduced.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aula, P., & Siira, K. (2010). Organizational Communication and Conflict Management Systems. Nordicom Review, 31(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free