BackgroundAlectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. MethodsIn a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in ...
CITATION STYLE
Peters, S., Camidge, D. R., Shaw, A. T., Gadgeel, S., Ahn, J. S., Kim, D.-W., … Mok, T. (2017). Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(9), 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1704795
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.