Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

  • Peters S
  • Camidge D
  • Shaw A
  • et al.
1.9kCitations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BackgroundAlectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. MethodsIn a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peters, S., Camidge, D. R., Shaw, A. T., Gadgeel, S., Ahn, J. S., Kim, D.-W., … Mok, T. (2017). Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(9), 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1704795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free