Factors affecting learning satisfaction in face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning among nursing students

23Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction may differ between face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning. For non-face-to-face flipped learning, which was widely employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to examine the impacts on learning satisfaction, which may vary depending on professor–student interaction rather than individual competencies, such as SDL readiness. This descriptive study, conducted 2 March 2019 to 24 June 2020, included 89 s-year, flipped-learning nursing students (28 face-to-face, 61 non-face-to-face). Students completed questionnaires about learning satisfaction, SDL readiness, and professor–student interaction. The data, collected using e-surveys, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple stepwise regression with IBM’s SPSS Statistics 25.0 program. The total average score of learning satisfaction (38.19 ± 6.04) was positively correlated with SDL readiness (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and professor–student interaction (r = 0.36, p = 0.001), although total learning satisfaction was significantly different between the face-to-face and the non-face-to-face groups (t = 5.28, p = 0.024). They were also significant influencing factors, along with face-to-face flipped learning, for total learning satisfaction (F = 18.00, p < 0.001, explanatory power = 36.7%), suggesting flipped learners in non-face-to-face contexts must increase engagement beyond professor–student interaction.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. Y. (2021). Factors affecting learning satisfaction in face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning among nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168641

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 17

41%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

41%

Researcher 5

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 13

41%

Social Sciences 11

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free