The Evolution of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Positive Inflexion Point

  • Tolcher A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2019, an important inflection point occurred when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved three new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of malignancies, including urothelial cancer (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (polatuzumab vedotin-piiq), and HER2 breast cancer (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki), and expanded the indication for ado-trastuzumab emtansine to early breast cancer. This near doubling in the number of approved ADCs within 1 year validates the ADC platform and represents a successful evolution over the past 30 years. ADCs were born in an era when systemic therapy for cancer was largely cytotoxic chemotherapy. Many of the investigational cytotoxic agents were determined to be too toxic for oral and intravenous use. The agents were especially potent, with inhibitory concentrations that inhibited 50% of cells in the nanomolar and picomolar range but had poor therapeutic indexes when administered systemically. Now, over the last 30 years, we have seen an evolution of the many aspects of this complex platform with better antigen target selection, more sophisticated chemistry for the linkers, a growing diversity of payloads from cytotoxic chemotherapy to targeted therapies and immunostimulants, and, with the recent series of regulatory approvals, a buoyed sense of optimism for the technology. Nonetheless, we have not fully realized the full potential of this platform. In this review, the many components of ADCs will be discussed, the difficulties encountered will be highlighted, the innovative strategies that are being used to improve them will be assessed, and the direction that the field is going will be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tolcher, A. W. (2020). The Evolution of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Positive Inflexion Point. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, (40), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_281103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free