Percutaneous venepuncture practice in a large urban teaching hospital

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens remains an important and largely preventable issue in hospital practice. This article argues that formal training can increase use of best practice phlebotomy. A survey of at-risk healthcare workers at a central London hospital was conducted to identify factors associated with use of an evacuated blood collection system (BD Vacutainer®) and gloves while taking blood. Eighty per cent of doctors and 37% of non-doctors performing percutaneous venepuncture did not use the Vacutainer system exclusively. Doctors qualified less than three years were particularly likely to prefer needle and syringe. Venepuncture technique training significantly increased the probability of always using the Vacutainer system from 7% to 46%. The only factor independently associated with glove use was operator experience. There is considerable room for improvement in phlebotomy technique, particularly among junior doctors. The Modernising Medical Careers initiative provides a unique opportunity to implement this.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Little, M. A., Hussein, T., Lambert, M., & Dickson, S. J. (2007). Percutaneous venepuncture practice in a large urban teaching hospital. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 7(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.7-3-243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free