Biochemical markers comparison of dynamic hip screw and Gamma nail implants in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture: A prospective study of 60 patients

2Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This prospective study compared the extent of surgical trauma following dynamic hip screw (DHS) or Gamma nail (GN) implantation in 60 patients (≥ 60 years old) with stable intertrochanteric fracture. Levels of the biochemical markers creatinine kinase (CK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured pre-and postoperatively. CRP levels were statistically significantly lower on postoperative days 1 and 2 in patients in the DHS versus the GN group; no other differences were observed. Surgical procedures for DHS implantation were considered less invasive than those for GN implantation, although the degree ofmuscle damage was similar in both groups. The degree of bone and bone marrow damage, rather than muscle tissue damage, may be crucial for determining the CRP response during the operative period. It is concluded that DHS implantation may be described as a more 'systemically' minimally invasive procedure than GN implantation. © 2011 Field House Publishing LLP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, W., Chen, Y., Shen, H., Yuan, T., Zhang, C., & Zeng, B. (2011). Biochemical markers comparison of dynamic hip screw and Gamma nail implants in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture: A prospective study of 60 patients. Journal of International Medical Research, 39(3), 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001103900315

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free