Competing Perspectives: Using Ethnographic Methods to Study Embodied and Emplaced Rhetorics

5Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ethnographic methods can inform research into rhetorical scenes. Interviews, participant observation, and affective modes of knowing can illuminate inquiries into complex rhetorical moments. Audience interpretations and judgments can inform competing comprehensions of sites and statements, providing multiperspectival judgment about localized rhetorical performances. Moreover, with its commitment to advocacy, deliberation, and identification, rhetoric offers ethnographers a robust accounting discourse which is performed through language, body, media, and text. Hess offers his ethnographic fieldwork at the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin, during which he witnessed playful acts including taking selfies or playing hide-and-seek in the memorial. Through interviews, however, Hess learned of more complex judgment about the memorial that connected such “play” with personal remembrance and a living history of the Jewish people.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hess, A. (2018). Competing Perspectives: Using Ethnographic Methods to Study Embodied and Emplaced Rhetorics. In Rhetoric, Politics and Society (Vol. Part F755, pp. 213–236). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free