Complexity upper bounds for classical locally random reductions using a quantum computational argument

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We use a quantum computational argument to prove, for any integer k ≥ 2, a complexity upper bound for nonadaptive k-query classical locally random reductions (LRRs) that allow bounded-errors. Extending and improving a recent result of Pavan and Vinodchandran [PV], we prove that if a set L has a nonadaptive 2-query classical LRR to functions g and h, where both g and h can output O(log n) bits, such that the reduction succeeds with probability at least 1/2 + 1/poly(n), then L ∈ PPNP/poly. Previous complexity upper bound for nonadaptive 2-query classical LRRs was known only for much restricted LRRs: LRRs in which the target functions can only take values in {0,1, 2} and the error probability is zero [PV]. For k > 2, we prove that if a set L has a nonadaptive k-query classical LRR to boolean functions g1, g 2, . . ., gk such that the reduction succeeds with probability at least 2/3 and the distribution on (k/2+√k)-element subsets of queries depends only on the input length, then L ∈PPNP/poly. Previously, for no constant k > 2, a complexity upper bound for nonadaptive k-query classical LRRs was known even for LRRs that do not make errors. Our proofs follow a two stage argument: (1) simulate a nonadaptive k-query classical LRR by a 1-query quantum weak LRR, and (2) upper bound the complexity of this quantum weak LRR. To carry out the two stages, we formally define nonadaptive quantum weak LRRs, and prove that if a set L has a 1-query quantum weak LRR to a function g, where g can output polynomial number of bits, such that the reduction succeeds with probability at least 1/2 + 1/poly(n), then L ∈ PPNP/poly. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tripathi, R. (2007). Complexity upper bounds for classical locally random reductions using a quantum computational argument. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4708 LNCS, pp. 548–558). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74456-6_49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free