Effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on pain and plasma interleukin-6 in patients undergoing hysterectomy

  • de Oliveira C
  • Sakata R
  • Slullitel A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interleukin-6 is a predictor of trauma severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain severity and plasma interleukin-6 after hysterectomy. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind study with 40 patients, aged 18-60 years. G1 received lidocaine (2 mg kg-1 h-1) or G2 received 0.9% saline solution during the operation. Anesthesia was induced with O2/isoflurane. Pain severity (T0: awake and 6, 12, 18 and 24 h), first analgesic request, and dose of morphine in 24 h were evaluated. Interleukin-6 was measured before starting surgery (T0), 5 h after the start (T5), and 24 h after the end of surgery (T24). RESULTS: There was no difference in pain severity between groups. There was a decrease in pain severity between T0 and other measurement times in G1. Time to first supplementation was greater in G2 (76.0 ± 104.4 min) than in G1 (26.7 ± 23.3 min). There was no difference in supplemental dose of morphine between G1 (23.5 ± 12.6 mg) and G2 (18.7 ± 11.3 mg). There were increased concentrations of IL-6 in both groups from T0 to T5 and T24. There was no difference in IL-6 dosage between groups. Lidocaine concentration was 856.5 ± 364.1 ng mL-1 in T5 and 30.1 ± 14.2 ng mL-1 in T24. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine (2 mg kg-1 h-1) did not reduce pain severity and plasma levels of IL-6 in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Oliveira, C. M. B., Sakata, R. K., Slullitel, A., Salomão, R., Lanchote, V. L., & Issy, A. M. (2015). Effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on pain and plasma interleukin-6 in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 65(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free