Minimally invasive biomarkers for therapy monitoring.

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Development of new drugs and optimal application of the drugs currently in use in clinical chemotherapy requires the application of biomarkers. Ideally, these biomarkers would stratify patients so that only those patients likely to respond to a particular therapy receive that therapy. However, that is not always feasible, and an alternative is to make use of early response biomarkers to determine the responding population. In this paper, a number of generic (i.e. not necessarily specific to the action mechanism of the compound) early-response biomarkers are discussed and compared in different models and with three compounds with quite different mechanisms of action: a VEGF-R inhibitor (PTK787), an mTOR inhibitor (RAD001) and a microtubule stabiliser (EPO906). The methods include noninvasive DCE-MRI and PET imaging for measuring tumour vascularity, metabolism and proliferation, as well as the minimally invasive WIN method for measuring tumour interstitial pressure (IFP). The data show that drug-induced changes in IFP (delta IFP) involve mechanism-dependent changes in the tumour vascular architecture, and that delta IFP may be considered a universal generic early-response marker of tumour response to therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McSheehy, P., Allegrini, P., Ametaby, S., Becquet, M., Ebenhan, T., Honer, M., … Wood, J. (2007). Minimally invasive biomarkers for therapy monitoring. Ernst Schering Foundation Symposium Proceedings, (4), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/2789_2008_093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free