Protective effect of neonatal BCG vaccines against tuberculous meningitis.

11Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Neonatal BCG vaccination reduces the risk of tuberculosis and provides protection higher than 80% against the development of meningeal and miliary tuberculosis in newborns. Tuberculosis meningitis remains a major problem and also an important cause of death in some countries. In countries with high and moderate incidence of tuberculosis, prevention from the most severe complications of tuberculosis can be achieved only with a high coverage of the universal BCG neonatal immunization, being higher than 98% in the cohort of newborns. The decrease in BCG immunization coverage within immunization program during the year 2003 in Bosnia and Herzegovina influenced the increase in tuberculous meningitis. During 2002, when coverage with BCG vaccination in cohort of newborns was 90%, the incidence rate of tuberculous meningitis was 19. 04%oo. With the 68% decrease in BCG immunization coverage in the cohort of newborns in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the year 2003, the incidence of tuberculous meningitis raised to 33 33%oo. It has been proven that the 22% decrease of the neonatal BCG immunization coverage in the cohort of newborns /vaccination program of children/ caused 175 times higher number of the tuberculous meningitis cases. Newborns affected by the tuberculous meningitis were not BCG vaccinated. BCG vaccine provided effective protection against tuberculous meningitis, as well against the death of newborns caused by tuberculosis.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puvacić, S., Dizdarević, J., Santić, Z., & Mulaomerović, M. (2004). Protective effect of neonatal BCG vaccines against tuberculous meningitis. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences / Udruzenje Basicnih Mediciniskih Znanosti = Association of Basic Medical Sciences, 4(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2004.3460

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

76%

Researcher 2

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

59%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

29%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0