Purpose: The ability to assess the brain-at-risk during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia remains a major clinical problem. Point-of-care monitoring can potentially dictate changes to management intraoperatively. In this observational study, we examined the correlation between a series of point-of-care monitors and lactate flux during CEA. Methods: Both neurosurgeons and vascular surgeons participated in the study. The patients underwent arterial-jugular venous blood sampling for oxygen, carbon dioxide, glucose, and lactate, n = 26; bispectral index (BIS) monitoring ipsilateral to side of surgery, n = 26; raw and processed electroencephalogram (EEG), n = 22; and bi-frontal cerebral oximetry using the Fore-Sight monitor, n = 20. Results: One patient experienced a new neurological deficit when assessed at 24 hr following surgery. Lactate flux into the brain was correlated with the greatest decrease in cerebral oximetry with carotid cross-clamping; lactate efflux was correlated with the least. The most noticeable changes in processed EEG (density spectral analysis) were also seen with lactate influx, but at a slower time resolution than cerebral oximetry. Loss of autoregulatory behaviour was demonstrated with lactate influx; however, no correlation was seen between lactate flux and BIS monitoring. Conclusion: There was a correlation between cerebral oximetry and lactate flux during carotid cross-clamping. The Fore-Sight monitor may be of value as a point-of-care monitor during CEA under general anesthesia. A novel finding of this study is lactate flux into the brain in the presence of a large difference in cerebral oxygenation during cross-clamping of the carotid artery. © 2010 Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Espenell, A. E. G., McIntyre, I. W., Gulati, H., Girling, L. G., Wilkinson, M. F., Silvaggio, J. A., … Mutch, W. A. C. (2010). Lactate flux during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia: Correlation with various point-of-care monitors. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 57(10), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9356-7