Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: A meta-analysis

66Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: A meta-analysis to compare complication rates following volar or dorsal surgical fixation of distal radius fracture. Methods: A detailed search of PubMed®/MEDLINE® was undertaken to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials published before 25 August 2012 that compared volar with dorsal fixation, in patients with distal radius fracture. Results: A quantitative meta-analysis of 12 trials (952 patients) was performed. There was no between-group difference in the overall rate of complications. Volar fixation was associated with significant increases in neuropathy (relative risk [RR] 2.19; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.27, 3.76) and carpal tunnel syndrome (RR 4.56; 95% CI 1.02, 20.44), and a reduction in tendon irritation, compared with the dorsal approach (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.17, 0.86). Conclusions: Dorsal fixation offers a lower risk of neuropathy and carpal tunnel syndrome than the volar approach, but a higher risk of tendon irritation. Patients with a distal radius fracture can expect similar outcomes after volar or dorsal surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, J., Yang, T. B., Luo, W., Qin, J. B., & Kong, F. J. (2013). Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Medical Research, 41(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060513476438

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free