Indicators or Incentives? Some Thoughts on the Use of the Penal Response Rate for Measuring the Activity of Public Prosecutors’ Offices in France (1999–2010)

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From the 1990s, the French judicial system has been undergoing revolutionary internal changes that thoroughly altered its organisational structure and its way of processing justice argued penal cases, insisting especially on the productivity of prosecutors. The promoters of this “fast” brand of justice argued that this has led to a more efficient penal justice system. A closer look at the actual figures, however, reveals the prosecutors’ use of different tools—like dropped cases or change of label—in order to preserve themselves from bad results in this context of managerialisation and benchmarking. This chapter also puts the light on the transfer of innovation and its perverse effect, standardisation, from one jurisdiction to another.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mouhanna, C., & Vesentini, F. (2016). Indicators or Incentives? Some Thoughts on the Use of the Penal Response Rate for Measuring the Activity of Public Prosecutors’ Offices in France (1999–2010). In Ius Gentium (Vol. 50, pp. 19–35). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25802-7_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free