Pilkada 2015 and patronage practice among bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

3Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Majority studies on electoral dynamics in Indonesia are reinforce patronage as a pattern of relationships between candidates, winning team, and voters. One of winning team element which have little attention from scholars is bureaucrat. Although, normatively, bureaucrats are required to neutral in all type of general election, but in fact bureaucrats is very involved deeply in general elections. Based on empirical research in Sintang District and Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, we found that bureaucrats have a significant role as a winning team in pilkada (direct election for local leader). Patronage is a keyword to explain political relation between bureaucrats and candidate in pilkada. This situation was triggered by the fact that there are many candidates who have social background as civil servant and, consequently, have direct access to bureaucracy. Bureaucrats have high motivation to participate in pilkada as a broker due to protecting their vested interest. In our cases, the vested interest of bureaucrat is career stability which is promising additional personal revenue and social status. Consequently, staffing (circulation of position) within bureaucracy does not followed by auction mechanism (merit system), but following nepotism mechanism (spoil system). The winner of pilkada is socially pressured to accommodate all bureaucrats who has become their winning team. Finally, we discuss our finding and propose future agenda research to understanding this phenomenon.

References Powered by Scopus

Revisiting the inclusion-moderation thesis in the context of decentralized institutions: The behavior of Indonesia's Prosperous Justice Party in national and local politics

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Local elections and democracy in indonesia: The Riau Archipelago

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indonesian politics in 2007: The presidency, local elections and the future of democracy

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hifz Al-Din (maintaining religion) and Hifz Al-Ummah (developing national integration): Resistance of Muslim youth to non-Muslim leader candidates in election

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ephemeral nature of local political monopolies

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngusmanto, N. (2016). Pilkada 2015 and patronage practice among bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 12(9), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 12

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 21

75%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

14%

Environmental Science 2

7%

Decision Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free