Abstract
An analysis of OWL ontologies represented in RDF/XML on the Web shows that a majority are OWL Pull. In many cases this may not be through a desire to use the expressivity provided by OWL Full, but is rather due to syntactic errors or accidental misuse of the vocabulary. We present a "rogues gallery" of common errors encountered, and describe how robust parsers that attempt to cope with such errors can be produced. © Springer-Verlag 2004.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bechhofer, S., & Volz, R. (2004). Patching syntax in OWL ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3298, 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_46
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
