Development of Algorithms for Automated Timed Up-and-Go Test Subtask and Step Frequency Analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Frailty is one of the major problems associated with an aging society. Therefore, frailty assessment tools which support early detection and autonomous monitoring of the frailty status are heavily needed. One of the most used tests for functional assessment of the elderly is the 'Timed Up-and-Go' test. In previous projects, we have developed an ultrasound-based device that enables performing the test autonomously. This paper described the development and validation of algorithms for detection of subtasks (stand up, walk, turn around, walk, sit down) and for step frequency estimation from the Timed Up-and-Go signals. The algorithms have been tested with an annotated test set recorded in 8 healthy subjects. The mean error for the developed subtask transition detection algorithms was in between 0.22 and 0.35 s. The mean step frequency error was 0.15 Hz. Future steps will include prospective evaluation of the algorithms with elderly people.

References Powered by Scopus

The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons

10885Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Usual gait speed is associated with frailty status, institutionalization, and mortality in community-dwelling rural older adults: A longitudinal analysis of the aging study of Pyeongchang rural area

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How wearable sensors have been utilised to evaluate frailty in older adults: a systematic review

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diz Felipe, A., Ziegl, A., Hayn, D., & Schreier, G. (2022). Development of Algorithms for Automated Timed Up-and-Go Test Subtask and Step Frequency Analysis. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 289, pp. 367–370). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210935

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 1

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free