Influência de diferentes graus de elevação da cabeceira na mecânica respiratória de pacientes ventilados mecanicamente

4Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The positioning of a patient in bed may directly affect their respiratory mechanics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the respiratory mechanics of mechanically ventilated patients positioned with different head angles hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Methods: This was a prospective physiological study in which static and dynamic compliance, resistive airway pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation were measured with the head at four different positions (0° = P1, 30° = P2, 45° = P3, and 60° = P4). Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni post-test and Friedman analysis were used to compare the values obtained at the different positions. Results: A comparison of the 35 evaluated patients revealed that the resistive airway pressure values in the 0° position were higher than those obtained when patients were positioned at greater angles. The elastic pressure analysis revealed that the 60° position produced the highest value relative to the other positions. Regarding static compliance, a reduction in values was observed from the 0° position to the 60° position. The dynamic compliance analysis revealed that the 30° angle produced the greatest value compared to the other positions. The peripheral oxygen saturation showed little variation, with the highest value obtained at the 0° position. Conclusion: The highest dynamic compliance value was observed at the 30° position, and the highest oxygenation value was observed at the 0° position.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez, B. P., Marques, T. I., Santos, D. R., Salgado, V. S., Júnior, B. R. N., De Azevedo Alves, G. A., … Forgiarini, L. A. (2015). Influência de diferentes graus de elevação da cabeceira na mecânica respiratória de pacientes ventilados mecanicamente. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 27(4), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20150059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free