La Validación Linguïstica en los Principales Cuestionarios de Salud y Calidad de Vida

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goals of this article are to summarize the problems and solutions found in translating seven Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) questionnaires from English into Spanish which have used a common international protocol based on back-translation techniques. The methodology used is based on the linguistic validation model including both the linguistic and the sociopragmatic equivalence. Five questionnaires from seven have obtained good results, not so two of them. Considering linguistic questions, there were more problems than good solutions on the lexical-semantic level. With respect to the sociocultural questions, there were more solutions than problems. The Spanish translated questionnaires still present deficiencies to be corrected, so both linguistic and sociocultural questions have to be studied more carefully in order not to allow differences between the translated versions and the source questionnaires.

References Powered by Scopus

Back-translation for cross-cultural research

9702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

9072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines

4533Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE IN THE HEALTH SECTOR: ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TYPES OF VIOLENCE IN THE ECUADORIAN CONTEXT

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Congost-Maestre, N. (2015). La Validación Linguïstica en los Principales Cuestionarios de Salud y Calidad de Vida. Lebende Sprachen, 60(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2015-0014

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free