Rearing laying hens: the effect of aviary design and genetic strain on pullet exercise and perching behavior

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: To prepare laying hens for life in cage-free aviaries, they must be reared in aviaries that accustom them to the challenges of navigating a complex three-dimensional structure. Rearing aviaries vary in design and contain a brooding compartment in which chicks are confined during the first six weeks of age. These compartments vary greatly in their size and complexity. The present study aimed to examine the impact of environmental complexity during early life and birds’ genetic strain on their space use and forms/types of exercise. Methods: Four consecutive flocks of brown and white chicks were raised in three styles of rearing aviary with low, intermediate, or high complexity. Behavioral observations were performed at three ages during the brooding phase (weeks 1, 3, and 5) and the open phase when the brooding compartments were opened (weeks 7, 11, and 17). Behaviors observed were categorized as aerial locomotion, perching, dynamic load-bearing behavior (DLB), and wing-involved load-bearing behavior (WLB). Results: During the brooding phase, chicks in aviaries of high complexity exercised most frequently (e.g., DLB events/minute: 1.75 in High vs 1.11 in Mid and 0.10 in Low, p<0.0001), and the effect remained for whites, but not the browns, during the open phase. White pullets exercised more than brown pullets both in brooding (e.g., 1.47 vs 1.28 DLB events/minute, p<0.0001) and open phases in High and Mid (e.g., 1.17 vs 0.93 DLB events/minute, housing x stain interaction p=0.009). Throughout rearing, whites had higher odds of perching than browns (brooding: 0.52 vs 0.45, p=0.04, open: 0.27 vs 0.17, p=0.0007). Discussion: We concluded that rearing aviary design can affect behavior during the brooding phase; however, once the brooding compartments were opened, housing differences almost exclusively affected white pullets. The data suggest that genetic strain of birds must be considered in the design of pullet housing with the goal of maximizing space use and musculoskeletal development of laying hen pullets.

References Powered by Scopus

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

12897Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal

1717Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overview of bone biology in the egg-laying hen

334Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The development of laying hen locomotion in 3D space is affected by early environmental complexity and genetic strain

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rearing laying hens: Environmental complexity and genetic strain affect pullet but not chick performance in a T-maze learning task

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A wing-assisted incline running exercise regime during rearing increases initial flight velocity during descent in adult white- and brown-feathered laying hens

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rentsch, A. K., Harlander, A., Siegford, J. M., Vitienes, I., Willie, B. M., & Widowski, T. M. (2023). Rearing laying hens: the effect of aviary design and genetic strain on pullet exercise and perching behavior. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1176702

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

64%

Psychology 2

18%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

9%

Environmental Science 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free