Safe Spaces, Difficult Dialogues, and Critical Thinking

  • Gayle B
  • Cortez D
  • Preiss R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this essay we explore a participation paradox associated with high-order learning. The greater the complexity and emotionality of the material, the more dangerous it becomes to participate in classroom discussions. We discuss the tensions involved with trying to balance building “safe spaces” and critical thinking capacity and examine those “moments of difficulty” when comfort and evaluation collide. Baxter Magolda’s four strategies that promote holistic learning are used to analyze the results from a focus group of ten graduating seniors. Results are discussed in the context of strategies to enhance student learning through the implementation of safe spaces that enhance critical thinking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gayle, B. M., Cortez, D., & Preiss, R. (2013). Safe Spaces, Difficult Dialogues, and Critical Thinking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free