Experiencing flow in social activities and its relationship with satisfaction with life and psychological wellbeing, in the sample of young adults

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Theoretical background: Flow can contribute to well-being, because as an activity theory, it is related to the positive consequences, and contributions to development of the behavior. Aim: Flow in a social interaction and its relationship with the different well-being concepts has not been studied yet, however the contributing role of social relationships to well-being has been emphasized a lot. This study aims to reveal this relationship. We investigate the effect of the frequency and intensity of flow in social activities, and flow synchronization. Methods: 1060 adult people took part in the online cross-sectional survey study- A ge: M(SD) = 26.67(10.76) years. They filled in the questionnaires anonymously: General Flow Description, General Flow Description in Social Interactions, Flow State Questionnaire, Flow Synchronization Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Scales of Psychological Well-being. Results: According to the hierarchical regression analysis, the frequency (β = 0.07, p = 0.038) and intensity (β = 0.08, p = 0.039) of flow in a social activity can predict satisfaction with life, while the frequency of flow in solitary situations (β = 0.10, p = 0.002) and flow synchronization (interactional aspects during a cooperative flow-inducing activity) (β = 0.15, p < 0.001) may contribute to psychological well-being Consequences: The social aspects of flow can contribute to well-being, the frequency, intensity and synchronization factors can help elaborating the person's mental health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magyarodi, T., & Olah, A. (2020). Experiencing flow in social activities and its relationship with satisfaction with life and psychological wellbeing, in the sample of young adults. Mentalhigiene Es Pszichoszomatika, 21(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1556/0406.21.2020.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free