ANALYSIS of the EFFECT of the DIFFERENCE between STANDING and SITTING POSTURES on NECK PROPRIOCEPTION USING JOINT POSITION ERROR TEST

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proprioceptive sense is a very important function for the body, and joint position error test (JPET) is commonly used to measure it. This study was to analyze the difference of proprioception in standing and sitting postures through the JPET. A total of 60 students (M/F, 12/48) in D University in Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea participated in this study. A JPET was performed with the subject's eyes closed to assess the neck proprioception. The movement of the neck was measured in flexion, extension, and lateral flexion, and separately measured when sitting and standing. The difference in repositioning errors between sitting and standing postures was analyzed using paired t-test. There was a significant difference in repositioning errors between sitting and standing posture in neck extension. There was no significant difference in repositioning errors between sitting and standing posture in neck flexion and lateral flexion. In conclusion, in a sitting posture, posterior neck muscles are used more than in the standing posture, which may negatively affect the proprioceptive accuracy of the neck and may also increase the neck repositioning errors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. S., Shin, Y. J., & Kim, S. G. (2021). ANALYSIS of the EFFECT of the DIFFERENCE between STANDING and SITTING POSTURES on NECK PROPRIOCEPTION USING JOINT POSITION ERROR TEST. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519421400480

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free