Model checking using SMT and theory of lists

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A main idea underlying bounded model checking is to limit the length of the potential counter-examples, and then prove properties for the bounded version of the problem. In software model checking, that means that only program traces up to a given length are considered. Additionally, the program's input space must be made finite by defining bounds for all input parameters. To ensure the finiteness of the program traces, these techniques typically require that all loops are explicitly unrolled some constant number of times. Here, we show how to avoid explicit loop unrolling by using the SMT Theory of Lists to model feasible, potentially unbounded program traces. We argue that this approach is easier to use, and, more importantly, increases the confidence in verification results over the typical bounded approach. To demonstrate the feasibility of this idea, we implemented a fully automated prototype software model checker and verified several example algorithms. We also applied our technique to a non software model-checking problem from biology - we used it to analyze and synthesize correct executions from scenario-based requirements in the form of Live Sequence Charts. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milicevic, A., & Kugler, H. (2011). Model checking using SMT and theory of lists. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6617 LNCS, pp. 282–297). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20398-5_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free