Clinical and clinicopathologic effects of large doses of raw linseed oil as compared to mineral oil in healthy horses.

16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The clinical and clinicopathologic effects of raw linseed oil and mineral oil were compared. In a crossover experimental design trial, 6 horses were given either raw linseed oil (2.5 mL/kg body weight) or mineral oil (10 mL/kg body weight), twice, 12 hours apart. Two weeks later, the horses received the opposite treatment. All horses given mineral oil or linseed oil developed nonformed feces by 24 hours of the first administration of oil. Horses treated with mineral oil had formed feces at 48 hours; horses treated with linseed oil developed normally formed feces at 96 to 108 hours. All horses treated with linseed oil had signs of depression and anorexia, and 3 had signs of mild colic. These signs were not observed in horses treated with mineral oil. Concentrations of serum glucose and bilirubin were significantly higher in horses treated with linseed oil when compared with horses treated with mineral oil.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schumacher, J., DeGraves, F. J., & Spano, J. S. (1997). Clinical and clinicopathologic effects of large doses of raw linseed oil as compared to mineral oil in healthy horses. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine / American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 11(5), 296–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00468.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free